Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 17(12): e0277899, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2140672

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study attempts to provide a picture of the hesitancy to vaccination against COVID-19 in Spain during the 2021 spring-autumn vaccination campaign, both in the general population and in healthcare professionals. METHODS: The participants were recruited using social media such as Facebook and Twitter, in addition to the cooperation of health personnel contacted with the collaboration of medical scientific societies. A cross-sectional study was carried out that included the response of an online questionnaire. The data were collected from April 30 to September 26, 2021. To assess the different associations between variables to be measured, we fit Poisson regression models with robust variance. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 3,850 adults from the general population group and 502 health professionals. Of the overall sample, 48.6% of participants from the general population were vaccinated against COVID-19, whereas in the healthcare professionals, 94.8% were vaccinated. The prevalence of general population vaccination increased with age, and was higher in women than men. Most participants did not show a preference for any vaccine itself. However, the prevalence of people vaccinated with their preferred vaccine was higher for the ones vaccinated with Pfizer's vaccine. 6.5% of the general population reported being reticent to be vaccinated. People from younger age groups, people with lower educational levels and those who were not from a risk group showed greater reluctance to be vaccinated. No gender differences in reluctancy were found. CONCLUSIONS: Health professionals were significantly less likely to refuse vaccination even though they had more doubts about the safety and efficacy of vaccines. On the other hand, younger people, those with a lower level of education and those who were not from a risk group were the most hesitant.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coronavirus , Adult , Male , Humans , Female , Spain/epidemiology , Population Groups , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vaccination , Health Personnel , Delivery of Health Care
2.
Front Public Health ; 10: 765016, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1903194

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has been a phenomenal challenge to global health care and will continue to be so in the upcoming months. Beyond its medical toll, COVID-19 has also exacerbated pre-existing social issues and created new inequalities. This has generated a series of ethical problems that will need to be carefully analyzed to avoid repeating similar mistakes in the context of other crises. Among those, we discuss here the bioethical implications of preserving individual freedom in the context of the early response to a pandemic and propose a global approach to the issue that could be applied in future health challenges.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Freedom , Global Health , Humans , Pandemics
3.
Mol Cancer Res ; 19(4): 549-554, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1058113

ABSTRACT

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as one of the biggest global health threats worldwide. As of October 2020, more than 44 million confirmed cases and more than 1,160,000 deaths have been reported globally, and the toll is likely to be much higher before the pandemic is over. There are currently little therapeutic options available and new potential targets are intensively investigated. Recently, Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) has emerged as an interesting candidate. Elevated levels of BTK activity have been reported in blood monocytes from patients with severe COVID-19, compared with those from healthy volunteers. Importantly, various studies confirmed empirically that administration of BTK inhibitors (acalabrutinib and ibrutinib) decreased the duration of mechanical ventilation and mortality rate for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. Herein, we review the current information regarding the role of BTK in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infections and the suitability of its inhibitors as drugs to treat COVID-19. The use of BTK inhibitors in the management of COVID-19 shows promise in reducing the severity of the immune response to the infection and thus mortality. However, BTK inhibition may be contributing in other ways to inhibit the effects of the virus and this will need to be carefully studied.


Subject(s)
Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/antagonists & inhibitors , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Adenine/analogs & derivatives , Adenine/pharmacology , Agammaglobulinaemia Tyrosine Kinase/metabolism , Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , Benzamides/pharmacology , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/enzymology , Humans , Lung/drug effects , Lung/virology , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/virology , Piperidines/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/adverse effects , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pyrazines/pharmacology , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/virology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL